Instagram/@amareisreal
The up-to-date update from veteran NBA player Amar’e Stoudemire served as a front for a complicated discussion being carried out on various online forums concerning religious law, identity issues, and politics in the Middle East. The basketball great-turned-scholar and instructor provided on his Instagram a commentary on Deuteronomy’s Parashat Re’eh, expounding on topics such as Terumah offerings and the pilgrimage festivals. The real stuff began in the comment section, where various ideologies came into conflict.
Advertisement
Stoudemire himself was once Orthodox converted in 2020 and in the very video was speaking about biblical commandments, kosher laws, and the warning against false prophets. His caption gave some background on Terumah-offering which was the agricultural produce that was given to the priests-and named the three pilgrimage festivals where people had to make a journey to Jerusalem: Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot. This post was accompanied by series of Hebrew hashtags translating either to ‘Yahoshaphat son of Abraham’ or the ‘road to the righteous’, with the intention perhaps to show his deep connection with the faith.
The comment section got embroiled very quickly in theological and political discussions. One user called factsfromajew instigated the controversy saying, “Yes make sure to stay away from the religion of encouragement of lies, and their false prophet Mohammed”; other users opposed some others again described the comment as unhelpful and divisive. The whole incident illuminated the underlying tension that is often brought into the limelight in interfaith discussions online.
Another raging thread spawned when user silent_prince05 put Stoudemire’s Jewish identity into question, asking: “Bro, you are from the Tribe of Juda. Why you dressing up as a Rev 2:9/Rev 3:9??” The introduction of those controversial biblical verses triggered a multilayered discussion of conversion, tribal membership, and legitimacy. Another user was then drawn in to defend Stoudemire’s status, stating, “as an actual member of the tribe of Judah by ancestry and practice, I can confirm that yes it is possible to become a member. It is called conversion, a long initiation process that takes a lot of dedication; Amar’e went through and completed this conversion and is thus a full member of the Tribe of Judah.”
The longest and the most politically charged one was a comment by a Hebrew-speaking user who delivered a speech against the Israeli governmental policies toward the Arab nations. The comment, when translated, accused the Israeli government of conspiring to “fight all Arab countries and expel their people so Jews can live in their place after destroying these nations’ peoples.” The commenter then questions whether killing Arabs can be justified by love of land ownership and draws a parallel between acts of resistance from the Palestinians and military operations conducted by Israel. The comment ends with a personal ad from a man in Cairo seeking an Israeli woman, provided she converts to Islam or “become Jewish in the original law of Prophet Moses.”
Beyond this, there were supportive comments popping up. Another user named andrewharary commented: “I absolutely love how interested you are in reviewing and understanding the parshiot. May Hashem bless you and allow you to continue to grow your knowledge and love for our shared heritage and your journey for emet.” Another user wished him simply, “Shabbat shalom you’re an inspiration,” showing that Stoudemire’s spiritual journey is reaching many followers.
The discussion trivia drifted back into another theological tangent, as thedeityofchristo commented, “We can’t keep the law bro. No one can. That is why the Messiah came and shed blood on the cross,” thereby introducing Christian theological blas to the Jewish textual debate.
Stoudemire’s post and the comment aftermath are like a microcosm of a broader pattern widely observed in online religion discourse, where sincere spiritual seeking is obstructed by politico-tensions, identity politics, and interfaith conflicts. Having retired from basketball, Amar’e, ex-Suns and Knicks star, is becoming progressively outspoken on his Jewish studies, with a concurrent enrollment in rabbinical studies. His social media presence, therefore, becomes an unusual sphere where sports fan culture, celebrity culture, and deep religious scholarship intersect, sometimes forming strange associations between communities which are not accustomed to conversing with one another.
A conspicuous feature about this particular post is how starkly it reveals how complicated Stoudemire’s position as a convert is: endorsed on the one hand by many members of the Jewish community and on the other hand challenged by others. The comments thereby darkly violent expand the discussion from biblical texts to the heated present-day political conflicts surrounding Israel and Palestine. Such a painful back-and-forth interspersing Hebrew, English, theological disputations, and political rhetoric in the comments is a microcosm of what is being played out on a greater scale about these questions.
In the wake of social networking breaking down walls separating various communities and knowing traditions, entities like Stoudemire, who straddle between celebrity and scholarship to spiritual seeking, open very rare channels for cross-cultural discourse. This inevitably gets wound in such conversations with apparent contradictions and dangerously heated scuffles. This is an authentic endeavor by many from various backgrounds trying to engage with traditions that are foreign to them. The fact that a posting about ancient biblical law could spawn conversations that touch upon contemporary geopolitical conflicts, conversion protocols, and proposals for interfaith weddings is telling about how religious texts are still relevant and act as living documents for communities through which they try to interpret the modern.
Advertisement
Such overwhelming commenting mirrors the exciting evolution of a previously merely celebrity Instagram account into a serious forum for actual religious dialogue, discussion, and contestation. Hence, this transition illustrates the notion of social media as the new public squares for theological conversations, being just as passionate, controversial, and complex as any flesh-and-blood debate. For good or for bad, this contemporary digital age has birthed spaces where biblical exegesis, identity politics, and international conflicts converge in real-time, and Amar’e Stoudemire’s up-to-date post is indeed a textbook example of this in action.
About the Author
