Instagram/@akademiks
The court has thrown out the defamation suit of Drake against Universal beat Group. The singer’s lawyers immediately communicated their intention to bring the ruling to higher courts and thereby prolong the quarrel which in the first place was caused by Kendrick Lamar‘s diss track ‘Not Like Us’. Instead of a freestyle contest between the two artists, the rivalry has turned into a legal battle with the court as the battleground.
Advertisement
DJ Akademiks was the one who first broke the news to his audience by sharing the official announcement from Drake’s legal representatives. The statement said, ‘We are going to appeal the ruling that was made today, and we expect the Appeal Court will take it up’. This particular legal course is just the extension of the already very public and notorious conflict in the beat industry.
The public reaction was pretty quick and, to a large extent, doubtful. One person pointed out the irony of the situation by saying ‘The funniest thing is that Kendrick has not even said a word since the dispute began’. This remark indeed depicts how the confrontation has shifted from artistic rivalry to corporate lawsuits with Lamar keeping silent while the lawyers pack it up.
Another user was, unfortunately, very much in doubt about Drake’s recent defeats and asked ‘How many L’s can DRAKE TAKE 1,2,3,4,5 plus 5’. The tone reflects the growing sentiment that the Toronto rapper has been encountering several professional difficulties lately, having been engaged in a musical dispute with Lamar and suffering this legal loss as well.
The decision that the lawsuit was groundless raised questions about the overall strategy of Drake more explicitly. ‘I could never have imagined that one day I would see Drake getting this many Ls,’ was the response of one long-time observer who managed to voice the disbelief that many people have about the creator’s misfortune. This comment raised the question of whether we are witnessing a temporary stumbling block or a more drastic change in the creator’s career trajectory.
The majority of the respondents were quite funny about the matter. ‘In order not to be disqualified for this L, Aubrey fans will put his name on the leading of Spotify Streams list,’ one user couldn’t stop laughing while commenting on the usual fan behavior of bringing up the streaming numbers during fights. The remark indicates that the metrics battle is still going on among the loyal followers even if one side is losing in court.
The lawsuit originated from the allegation made by Drake’s camp that Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us’ had defamatory content. Universal beat Group, the record label associated with both artists, found itself in a strange situation where it was being sued by one of its artists for a song that involved another creator from the same label.
One user made a pointed remark when he asked ‘Where are all the “When Drake eventually comes out on leading and reveals everything, beat won’t be the same” fans immediately?’, referring to the bright predictions that some fans had at the time of the lawsuit. The fact that the victorious rhetoric has gone silent after the ruling dismissal speaks volumes about the prevailing mood.
From the very beginning, the legal analysts were highly doubtful about the possibility of the lawsuit being won, pointing to the exceptionally high standard for defamation suits involving public figures. The court’s ruling to throw out the case has confirmed these forecasts; however, Drake’s team is developing its tactic to draw out the legal battle through the appeals process.
The controversy has divided the beat critics, with some seeing it as a moral choice and others as an unnecessary escalation. ‘He has to cut off anyone who led him to believe he had a chance with that ridiculous case,’ one critic stated, showing that he thought the legal battle was a flop from the very start.
Drake’s fans who stand by him no matter what are still somewhat bitter about the never-ending conflict. ‘I’m a drake fan but I wish he would just drop it,’ one spokesperson said, adding ‘he’s making us look bad’. This sentiment indicates that some supporters believe the court struggle is more detrimental than beneficial to the creator’s reputation.
A comment about ‘superpowers being neutralized’ perfectly captures the consensus among people regarding the situation—a degrading occasion for an creator who has always been accustomed to dominating the beat scene. The law, unlike the charts, does not play by the same rules, and even superstars must conform.
The beat world is watching very closely whether or not Drake’s attorney will prevail in overturning the dismissal as the matter is ultimately going to the appeals court. Depending on the outcome, there could be a ripple effect that extends beyond this particular dispute and even affects the future practices of record companies concerning artists’ intramural conflicts.
Advertisement
At present, the dismissal signifies yet another hurdle in what has already been a very testing period in Drake’s professional life. It is the appeals process that will determine if this is the final word on the matter or just another chapter in the ongoing saga of a legal battle that started with beat and ended in the corporate court. Ayesha Curry recently celebrated a friend’s birthday with a dance video that went viral. Meanwhile, Drake’s performance in Milan was met with great enthusiasm from his Italian fans.
About the Author
