Is Kim Soo Hyun falsely ACCUSED in Kim Sae Ron dating case?
On October 30, South Korea’s National Assembly was stunned when popular YouTuber Eun Hyun-jang, known for her channel Master of Business (장사의 신), testified, openly discussing the dangers of online lies, cyber blackmail, and fake news. She described how such lies are not only ruining the lives of ordinary people, but have also targeted major stars like actor Kim Soo Hyun. Eun called on the government to enact stricter laws against online defamation and fabrication of evidence.
What did Eun Hyun Jang say about Garo Sero head?
According to Poprant, Eun Hyun-jang explained that since January 2024, Kim Se-ui, head of the Garosero Research Institute, has been repeatedly making false accusations. He said, For a year, Kim Se-ui spread lies about me calling me a Chinese agent, a scammer, and involved in stock manipulation, Eun Hyun-jang stated. Because of those baseless attacks, my company, which once made ₩10 billion in annual sales, went bankrupt. I had to let go of employees, and partner companies also collapsed.
Is Garo Sero accusing Kim Soo Hyun only for money?
Yoon explained that many YouTube channels are only after views and money. He said, They only care about clicks and money. Lies that attract attention become income.
Is evidence in the Kim Soo Hyun case fake?
Yoon’s testimony became more serious when he alleged that Kim Se-yi fabricated evidence against Kim Soo Hyun. He said, Kim Se-ui held three so-called ‘press conferences’ where he presented fake evidence, fabricated KakaoTalk messages, doctored photos, and even AI-generated audio clips. He further said, Because of these lies, Kim Soo-hyun’s reputation was destroyed. He lost endorsements and is still fighting lawsuits with advertisers.These are investigations the state should be doing, but private citizens like us are the ones proving the truth.
All about false evidence in the Kim Soo Hyun case
Eun Hyun said that those who spread lies should be given severe punishment (punitive damages). He revealed, I’ve seen their financial records after buying 50% of one of Kim Se-ui’s companies they were raking in billions from YouTube and sponsorships. Yet even if caught, they pay a ₩300,000 fine. Who wouldn’t keep doing it? That’s why we need punitive damages.
All about false evidence in the Kim Soo Hyun case
Yoon said that those who spread lies should be given severe punishment (punitive damages). He revealed, I’ve seen their financial records after buying 50% of one of Kim Se-ui’s companies they were raking in billions from YouTube and sponsorships. Yet even if caught, they pay a ₩300,000 fine. Who wouldn’t keep doing it? That’s why we need punitive damages.
What did Parliament’s say against fabricated fake evidence?
Committee Chairperson Choi Min-hee agreed with Eun Hyun and said that this testimony strengthens the debate surrounding the Anti-Fake Information Act. Yoon concluded his statement by saying, Only punitive damage laws can stop cyber racketeers. Without real consequences, more people will suffer like me and like Kim Soo-hyun.
