Instagram/@jasmineforus
A new political ad starts out addressing Californians in favor of Prop. 50, claiming that the initiative would put an end to gerrymandering, in purportedly passing judgment on Crockett’s own Texas congressional district. The ad really wanted to say that Donald Trump had directed Texas Republicans to “rig the next election.”
Advertisement
The emotionally charged ad consists of Congresswoman Crockett giving a stirring call for representation: “When Donald Trump ordered Texas Republicans to rig the next election, they drew my seat off the map. They’re gaming the midterms by disenfranchising black and brown voters, denying our voice and our vote.” The ad puts California voters forth as being uniquely positioned to fix what it calls a national-day-of-wrongs voting rights problem through the initiative process.
The comments section reflected sharp divides considering that viewers expressed strong opinions for and against the measure. One enthusiast in California remarked, “As a Californian, I can’t wait to VOTE YES ON 50!!!” with several American flag emojis for emphasis. Another from Texas said, “From this Texan, PLEASE Vote YES!!!!” followed by prayer hands and blue heart emojis, suggesting that for some Democratic voters, there exists a certain solidarity that stretches across both states.
“YES ON 50” statements repeated numerous times hammer the support given by the Yes side. One such thankful commenter declared, “Thank you to EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU voting YES to Prop 50 in California!!! I cannot thank you all enough! Every single one of you are heroes!” The comment was followed by fire, clapping hands, and American flag emojis, all trademarks of the passionate nature some viewers have invested into this result.
Opposition also sprang forth in strength in the comments. One opponent challenged, “Totally false. Trump had nothing to do with Texas.. I’m voting NO ON 50,” throwing into question the foundation upon which the ad stood. Dissent was put forth by another: “Prop 50 in Ca is Unconstitutional and he knows it. And she knows it too,” further putting into doubt the very legality of the initiative.
The hostility kept building, with one saying, “Good your Pathetic. And Normal people in California are voting No, No, & No again. Your days are Numbered same as Newsom.” Clown emojis were liberally sprinkled alongside the comment in a display of pure rage. The other evaluator commented, “Distance yourself from JCrockett asap. She is causing more damage to the Democrat rave than anyone ever could!”
Some comments demonstrated confusion or skepticism toward the proposition. One read “Absolutely no gives back the power to the politicians,” whereas another gurgled down, “you must love high taxes,” although redistricting and taxation were not discussed in direct relation. Those comments toss out the possibility that some voters may be approaching the proposition by broad-brush political stance rather than a concrete stand on the issue.
The conversation turned toward the off-topic realm several times, one commenting: “What about GAZA? What about sending millions from your tax money to B Natanjahu?” Another one invoking “the Epstein files” reflected how the scope of political argument tends to diverge and broaden; one particularly vicious condemnation read: “LETS STOP PLAYING WITH THESE TRAITORS. FUQ MAGA PED0 CULT,” a fitting artistic description of today’s argument.
Even more interesting is the fact that a number of comments were about Congresswoman Crockett herself rather than the proposition. One user posed the thought: “Are We All on Board for Writing in ‘Jasmine Crockett‘ for President?” The responses were mixed; one person said, “Love her. But that would be throwing a vote away. Please no write ins.” Another commenter mocked the partnership between Crockett and California Governor Gavin Newsom, while a third quickly stepped up to defend Crockett by drawing a comparison to another Republican congresswoman.
Advertisement
The comment section, therefore, really displays the deep division in American politics today, with supporters looking at Proposition 50 as their last line of defense on voting rights, and opponents putting the proposition under the spotlight for being unconstitutional or political trickery. In the upcoming days when Californians will go out and cast their votes on this initiative, the immediate reaction produced by the ad itself proves just how much a local issue can seep into state affairs and gain national recognition and enormous interest. Henceforth, the decision shall be taken track as a litmus test for public opinion on questions of voting rights and political representation preceding the forthcoming rounds of elections. This perspective on safety in America adds another layer to the ongoing political discourse.
About the Author
