Negotiations between the WNBA and the Women’s National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA) have reached a critical juncture, with the players’ union reportedly signaling its dissatisfaction with the league’s new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) proposal. While the league has made significant financial strides in its offer—including the groundbreaking proposal of a maximum player salary exceeding $1 million—Sources told ESPN that the union is indicating that the offer fails to address core demands related to travel, operational standards, and overall quality of life for its athletes.
The current CBA, which was already extended from its original October 31 expiration, is immediately operating under a new deadline of November 30. This compressed timeline is fueling urgency as the league prepares for a major expansion draft—which cannot be finalized until a new agreement is ratified—and as star players continue to weigh their options amid lucrative non-WNBA opportunities.
Financial Gains vs. Structural Changes
On the monetary front, the WNBA’s proposal represents a historic leap forward. The Associated Press was the first to report that the league’s offer includes a maximum salary that surpasses the $1 million mark for the first time, potentially reaching over $1.1 million in the first year of the new discount. The proposal also looks to establish a minimum salary starting above $220,000, which would substantially raise the floor for all players. If accepted, the league average salary would be projected to settle around $460,000, showcasing the league’s commitment to increased compensation tied to its recent business growth.
However, the WNBPA’s reaction suggests that this offer does not solve the fundamental issues that drove the players to opt out of the previous agreement. The union’s priorities extend beyond salary and revolve around establishing professional, modern standards for the league’s operations.
Key among the players’ sticking points is the formalization of charter travel. Despite the league’s recent history of high-profile travel issues and the perceived competitive advantage and safety concerns of flying commercial, the WNBPA feels the new proposal does not adequately address a league-wide policy for charter flights. This demand is not merely about comfort; it is tied directly to player health, safety, and performance during a rigorous season.
The negotiations are taking place against a backdrop of increasing financial competition. The rise of alternative leagues, such as the startup “Project B,” which is offering star players multi-million dollar contracts for its inaugural season, adds a layer of complexity. Although Project B operates during the WNBA offseason, the threat of leading talent prioritizing outside opportunities if the WNBA experience doesn’t sufficiently improve is a real factor. Several established WNBA stars have already committed to playing in the new offseason league, signaling the financial pull of non-WNBA avenues.
As the November 30 deadline approaches, the pressure is squarely on the league to close the gap between its impressive financial package and the players’ non-negotiable structural and operational demands. The WNBPA is holding firm that the next CBA must reflect the WNBA’s rapidly growing cultural and economic benefit by prioritizing the professional environment of the athletes who drive that growth.
About the Author
